Why Wasn’t Donald Trump Charged for Michael Cohen’s Actions?

When Michael Cohen served time in jail for actions directed by Donald Trump, many wondered why the former President did not face similar legal consequences. In this article, we explore the complexities and complexities surrounding the charges against Michael Cohen and why Trump was not indicted for the same offenses.

Understanding the Charges Against Michael Cohen

Michael Cohen, former lawyer for Donald Trump, pleaded guilty to various crimes, including lying to the bank and tax fraud (among others). These actions were in line with Trump’s directives, according to the indictment. However, there appears to be no public discussion about charging Trump for these violations. Why is this the case?

Trump’s Involvement in the Charges

Co-conspirator 1 in the Cohen indictment has been identified as Donald Trump. His role in these charges is clear, yet no evidence has been presented to suggest direct involvement from Trump himself for the bank fraud and tax fraud charges. The U.S. Department of Justice, under the policy of not indicting a sitting president, protected Trump during his presidency. However, upon leaving office, Trump faced specific charges stemming from actions taken in New York that allegedly violated state laws.

Limited Evidence and Legal Constraints

One of the primary reasons for the lack of charges against Trump is the absence of explicit evidence directly implicating him in Cohen's illegal actions. The New York District Attorney’s Office handled charges specific to Trump's actions in New York, while the U.S. Department of Justice did not have the authority to charge a sitting president. This distinction is crucial in understanding why Trump was not indicted for the same offenses as Cohen.

Trials and Legal Processes

Contrary to popular belief, Trump did not do nothing illegal. He played a significant role as a co-conspirator in the actions leading to Cohen’s imprisonment. While many believe the Trump administration to be corrupt and lacking a robust legal system, it’s important to recognize the legal constraints and evidentiary requirements necessary for charging high-ranking officials.

Double Standards and Public Perception

The disparity in treatment between Trump and others involved in the same actions can be seen as indicative of a double standard. Many critics argue that the system is biased against Trump supporters, while others believe that legal processes are simply following the rules. Regardless of the perspective, the focus on charging Trump has been met with skepticism by those who argue there is insufficient evidence.

Call for Action and Public Outcry

Many individuals, including those who harbor strong opinions about Trump, are questioning why prosecution has been delayed. There is a growing push for swift and thorough investigations to ensure justice is served. The process of trying a former president is complex and can take a significant amount of time, often attracting public attention and scrutiny.

Whether one supports Trump or not, the lack of charges against him for the actions pointed out by Cohen remains a point of contention in the ongoing political landscape. It is important to questions and discuss these issues openly to ensure transparency and accountability in the legal system.