Why Pro-Life Advocates Are Actually Pro-Forced-Birth, Not Pro-Life

The term pro-life is often used to describe individuals and groups who advocate for the protection of the unborn and oppose abortion. However, the reality is often more nuanced and less aligned with the ideals they claim to support. In this article, we will explore why many pro-life advocates are more accurately described as pro-forced-birth, and why this view is fundamentally hypocritical and unjust.

The Hypocrisy of Pro-Life Advocates

Pro-life advocates are often accused of being inherently hypocritical. While they express concern for the fetus, they frequently ignore the well-being of the mother carrying it. Moreover, their stance is inconsistent when the child is born. These same individuals often do not care about the child's protection, basic needs, or even their existence if the child falls into certain categories.

For instance, if the child is born into poverty, they may view the child as a burden, claiming they are 'lazy leeches' or 'stealing taxpayer money.' Furthermore, if the child is gay or transgender, they might argue that the child does not deserve to exist. This inconsistent view suggests that a true pro-life stance would prioritize the individual's life above all else, not just at the fetal stage.

The True Nature of Pro-Life Advocacy

The term 'pro-life' is often used as a propaganda label for those who wish to punish women for having sex. Many pro-life advocates are still in favor of the Second Amendment, including the right to possess assault weapons, which has no place in the pro-life agenda. They oppose measures that could reduce the number of abortions, such as comprehensive sex education, free access to birth control, strict no-tolerance policies for rape, and economic support systems for mothers.

The Case of Forced Birth and Maternal Mortality

A particularly egregious example of the pro-life/pro-forced-birth stance is their support for forcing a 10-year-old girl to continue a pregnancy after she has been raped. This violates the basic human rights of a child and disregards her well-being and life. It is unequivocally evil to force a 10-year-old to carry a fetus to term, especially when the fetus is not yet viable and the mother is young and vulnerable.

The argument that such situations don’t happen is a dangerous and uninformed response. Undoubtedly, instances of sexual violence and exploitation of minors do occur, and they are morally reprehensible. It is critical to address these issues without dismissing or downplaying them.

The Vitality of Comprehensive Support

A true pro-life stance would advocate for comprehensive support for both the mother and the child. This includes:

Comprehensive sex education to empower individuals with knowledge to make informed decisions. Access to free birth control without parental consent, recognizing that access to contraception is essential to reproductive health. Real consequences for perpetrators of sexual assault to ensure justice and safety for victims. Economic support systems to empower mothers and ensure they can provide for their children. Free healthcare for all to prevent financial strain and ensure access to necessary medical care. Offices of parental leave to support working mothers and children's well-being. Higher minimum wage and affordable housing to reduce poverty and improve quality of life.

By focusing on these measures, true pro-life advocates can ensure that both the mother and the child receive the support they need to thrive, rather than forcing a child into an untenable and inhumane situation.

Conclusion

In summary, the label of pro-life is often more accurately described as pro-forced-birth. This stance is rooted in a deep lack of respect for the actual lived experiences of women and children. Instead of supporting comprehensive measures that promote health, well-being, and justice, many pro-life advocates prioritize punishment over care. It is crucial to recognize and advocate for true pro-life values that prioritize life and dignity at every stage.