Why Are Young People Not Given Positions of Real Power?

The question of why young people are not given positions of real power, such as prime minister, has been a topic of much discussion and debate. Several factors, including experience, capability, and societal norms, contribute to this observation.

What Will Be the Gain?

The motivations for promoting young individuals to positions of power are multifaceted. Proponents argue that young leaders bring fresh, innovative thinking to the table, and they often aim to inject new energy and vibrancy into the political system. However, the question remains whether such a shift is truly beneficial or whether it might lead to undue scrutiny and criticism based on age alone.

Expectations from Youths

There is a belief that young politicians can bring about necessary changes and reforms to the system. However, what is often overlooked is that the traits and attitudes that make for a good leader are not defined by age. The character and integrity of a leader are critically important. While Akhilesh Yadav, the Chief Minister of Uttar Pradesh, and Mayawati, a former Chief Minister, may have different public perceptions, it is their actions and experiences that truly matter. Simply attributing success or failure to age is a flawed perspective.

The Time Factor

Every individual requires time to mature and develop the necessary skills and experiences to lead effectively. A ten-year-old is neither ready to become a graduate nor should a 21-year-old be elected as an MP. Similarly, expecting a forty-year-old to become the Prime Minister prematurely is unrealistic. History has shown that a rush to place individuals in top leadership positions often results in disappointment and failure.

The Case for Patience with Young Politicians

Consider figures like Sachin Pilot, Rahul Gandhi, and Jyotiraditya Scindia. Their entry into politics and the allure of dynastic succession highlight the need for patience. Just as a young person might be groomed for a top leadership role within a political dynasty, young politicians require time to assert their leadership and establish themselves as credible figures. Building a reputation as a capable leader takes time, and rushing this process can often have detrimental effects.

Experience and Power Dynamics in India

To become the Prime Minister of a country, one must not only possess the necessary experience but also navigate complex power dynamics. In many countries, including India, gaining power is often more about political clout than capability. It is not uncommon for young individuals to be nominated for positions such as MPs or MLAs due to their association with established leaders, not because of their own merit.

While it is certainly possible to see young politicians in governance positions, these roles are often filled by relatives or close associates of already esteemed leaders. The traditional practice of passing on leadership within dynastic families means that young individuals are frequently overlooked for genuine merit-based positions. This, in turn, reflects a broader need for a system that values and nurtures young leaders based on their abilities rather than their connections.

Conclusion

The dearth of young leaders in positions of real power is a complex issue that demands a multifaceted solution. Balancing the need for fresh perspectives with the realities of accumulated experience is crucial. As societies evolve, so too must the systems that govern leadership, ensuring that age is not a limiting factor but rather a reflection of one's readiness and competence.