Introduction

In the world of text editors, Vim and Emacs stand as two of the most popular and powerful tools. They serve a wide range of purposes and attract users with their unique features and vast communities. A common question among developers is whether it is possible—and beneficial—to use both Vim and Emacs together. In this article, we explore the reasons why some individuals opt to use both editors, the philosophies behind their usage, and the practical implications.

Why Use Both Vim and Emacs?

There are several reasons why users might find it advantageous to use both Vim and Emacs. One user reports using Vim for editing shell scripts and single-file projects, while preferring Emacs for multi-file programming projects. Another user mentions that while there is no point in using both editors simultaneously, the integration of Vim-like key bindings in Emacs through Evil mode allows for a unified experience.

Some users switch between the two editors based on their specific needs. For example, one user uses Vim for quick edits of system files and specific HTML tasks at home where they have customized plugins. At work, they rely heavily on Emacs for managing org documents, codework, and system documentation. This flexibility allows them to leverage the strengths of both editors in different contexts.

Philosophical Differences

The decision to use both Vim and Emacs can often be attributed to philosophical differences. Vim is often seen as a tool that complements the Unix philosophy of small, modular programs working together. Users can leverage Vim alongside other Unix tools like tmux, weechat, and mutt to create a seamless development environment.

In contrast, Emacs is considered an all-in-one solution that serves as both a text editor and a platform for other applications, written in Emacs Lisp (elisp). It is an Integrated Development Environment (IDE) in itself, providing a wide range of features directly within the editor. One user advocates for the Unix philosophy, stating that Vim is not an IDE, while another suggests that Emacs is the IDE. However, the use of Evil mode in Emacs allows users to adopt a streamlined workflow equivalent to Vim's.

Practical Considerations

The compatibility and accessibility of Vim are also discussed. Due to its wide availability, Vim is pre-installed on many systems, including servers. Additionally, Evil mode can be used to emulate Vim-like key bindings within Emacs, making the transition easier for users familiar with Vim's keyboard shortcuts.

For many users, the choice between Vim and Emacs often depends on the context and specific tasks. According to one user, configuring Emacs with Evil mode allows them to maintain their Vim muscle memory while gradually incorporating Emacs-specific key bindings. This approach ensures a smooth transition and allows for the best of both worlds.

Conclusion

Using both Vim and Emacs is a viable and even beneficial approach for individuals who require flexibility and a range of functionalities. Whether one prefers the Unix philosophy or the all-in-one solution provided by Emacs, the combination of both editors can enhance productivity and allow for a tailored development environment. While there is no clear-cut answer to whether one should use both, the practical benefits and personal preferences often lead users to explore the potential of these two powerful editors together.