The Theory Behind the Creation of Our Universe by Random Chance: A Scientific Analysis and Refutation

Scientific inquiry demands empirical evidence and theoretical consistency, often in contradiction to the unfounded assertions made about the origins of the universe. Many believe in a random chance theory behind the creation of the universe without any underlying scientific evidence or theoretical basis.

Elements of the Cosmological Continuum

In the realm of scientific discourse, the concepts of time, space, and energy/matter are intertwined and form a continuous, interdependent whole. This means that for time, space, and matter to exist, they must be present simultaneously or none of them can exist. Without space, matter cannot take form; without matter, time cannot be defined.

The First Law of Thermodynamics, often overlooked by evolutionists, highlights that energy, like time and space, cannot be created or destroyed on its own. This implies that any phenomenon requiring energy must originate from an initial source of energy, otherwise, the entire concept of cosmic evolution becomes scientifically impossible. So, where did the energy that triggered cosmic evolution come from?

Second Law of Thermodynamics: Implications for Evolution

The Second Law of Thermodynamics states that entropy, or disorder, always increases with time. This runs counter to the definition of evolution, which is typically associated with increasing order and complexity. If scientific evidence from decades of study can be trusted, the increasing disorder implies that life cannot originate from a primordial soup, as the concept of spontaneous generation contradicts the fundamental laws of thermodynamics.

Mutations and Macro-Evolution: A False Dichotomy

Mutations, as understood in scientific literature, represent a reorganization or loss of pre-existing genetic information, rather than the creation of new genetic material. Hence, mutations do not contribute to macro-evolution, a theory that posits the transformation of one species into another through gradual changes. Since mutations do not produce new information, they cannot account for the vast biological diversity observed in nature.

Cause and Effect: A Physical Law of Nature

According to Newton's Third Law, every action has an equal and opposite reaction. Applying this to time, space, and matter, every effect, such as the expansion of space and the existence of matter, must have a cause. Science supports the notion that without energy, there can be no movement (time), no expansion (space), and no matter itself (since matter is a form of energy).

The Divine Cause: Intelligent Design vs. Naturalism

The continuous interaction of energy, time, space, and matter cannot be self-sustaining or self-caused. There must be an initial cause, i.e., an intelligent mind, responsible for the creation of these elements. This aligns with the concept of Intelligent Design, where an intelligent agent (God) is the cause of the universe's existence.

The refusal of some to accept the First and Second Laws of Thermodynamics and Newton's Third Law stems from a preference for a narrative rooted in self-delusion rather than empirical truth. Modern evolutionists often rely on pseudo-science, creating narratives that lack scientific integrity and verifiability. These narratives substitute imagination for empirical evidence, which is crucial for the advancement of scientific knowledge.

Conclusion and Alternative Perspectives

The premise that the universe arose by random chance contradicts established scientific laws and principles. A random universe requires a starting point of energy, which implies an intelligent agent as the cause. If the universe did not create itself or arise from naturalistic processes, then intelligent design—a creation by a supreme being—must be considered. In conclusion, rejecting or fearing the truth does not bring scientific understanding but hinders it.