The Likelihood of FCC Restoring Net Neutrality: Debunking Misconceptions

Whenever the topic of Net Neutrality resurfaces, like a tale from an old chestnut, it generates a flurry of discussion among internet users and tech enthusiasts. Many believe the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) is poised to take significant action to restore this principle, but the reality is far more nuanced.

Understanding Net Neutrality

First, let's clarify what Net Neutrality actually means. According to the Google definition, it is the principle that Internet service providers (ISPs) should treat all online content equally, without discriminating or charging differently based on the source, type of content, platform, device, user, or other similar criteria.

This principle has existed since long before the term was coined. In the United States, the internet has always been neutral, and it remains so today. Both the Department of Justice (DOJ), the FCC, and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) ensure that net neutrality principles are upheld. Moreover, market forces play a crucial role in maintaining this neutrality, as consumers tend to favor services that do not block or throttle content.

The 2015 FCC Ruling and Its Repeal

The 2015 FCC ruling, which classified broadband as a common carrier under Title II, aimed to enforce net neutrality regulations. However, this ruling was repealed in 2018. This repeal did not change the fundamental nature of the internet; instead, it shifted the regulatory framework.

Those who claim that the internet was neutral before 2015 and is still neutral now are correct. The repeal of the 2015 regulations was replaced by newer ones, which brought a renewed focus on maintaining net neutrality principles.

Myths vs. Reality

One of the common misconceptions is that ISPs will suddenly violate the principles of net neutrality due to the repeal of the 2015 regulations. While it is true that some ISPs will try to break the law and engage in practices that deviate from net neutrality, there are strict consequences, including legal action and market pressures, that prevent such behavior.

For example, any ISP that tries to slow down or block content from specific websites or applications will face severe repercussions. Just as murder is against the law, ISPs that violate net neutrality principles will also face legal and market penalties.

The Current State of Play

Currently, the internet in the United States remains neutral. There is no evidence that subscribers pay more for specific services or experience throttling. In fact, some argue that net neutrality actually hindered innovation and led to the consolidation of ISPs, increasing their market power and reducing competition.

While the likelihood of the FCC restoring net neutrality regulations is low, it does not mean that ISPs will violate the principle of net neutrality. The market and regulatory environment continue to ensure that the internet remains a level playing field for all users and content providers.

Conclusion

The internet has always been neutral, and it remains so today. The repeal of the 2015 FCC regulations and the subsequent replacement by newer ones have not altered this fundamental truth. It is important to separate myths from reality and understand that while some ISPs may try to break the law, the legal and market mechanisms are robust enough to prevent such behavior.