The Infinite Regression of God: A Philosophical Inquiry

The concept of the infinite regression of God is a profound and often complex philosophical argument. This argument challenges the traditional belief in a supreme being, emphasizing that if such a being exists as a creator, then what created that being? This question leads to an endless chain of inquiry, each step further back into the past.

God was believed to have originated in the 4th-dimensional spirit world above our 3-dimensional material world. The idea is that God began as a spark of light, a mere ball of energy, and embarked on a journey of self-discovery that spanned 100 billion years. This flame of enlightenment was innately filled with love, and its essence permeates all of existence.

Understanding the nature of God is not merely about recognizing a physical entity. Instead, it is more about recognizing that God is not bound by time, space, or physical form. As stated, 'The joy of God is that God is not in the physical form before He is innocent, and God is in me.' This belief suggests that God is present within every individual, and each of us is a piece of God’s grand creation.

This human-like perception of God is also prevalent in the natural world, where nature itself is seen as a reflection of God. 'Nature is also God,' and this dual understanding helps us appreciate the interconnectedness of all things. Within this perspective, the idea of a divine presence within us is not just a metaphor but a reality. 'Is it the form of God. Who is within us, and it says God, this is its form.' This internalized notion of God reinforces the belief that divinity is intrinsic to our existence.

However, the human mind often grapples with the idea of an infinite regression. As we look back in history and seek the causes of our existence, we often face a limit where we run into a fundamental boundary: God. This ultimate creator is seen as the starting point, existing without a beginning or a cause. The infinite regression of God suggests that if God is the first cause, then there should be another cause that created God, ad infinitum.

This paradoxical loop is evident in the notion of an infinite series of finite causes, meaning that there is no definitive beginning or creation time or event. The infinite regression of God is a philosophical argument that argues against the existence of a supreme being or deity who is the ultimate creator. It posits that if God is the ultimate cause, then what created God? If we accept the premise that God is the first cause, then we must also accept an infinite chain of causes that lead to God.

The argument of infinite regression of God is often used as a counterargument to the concept of God as a first cause or an uncaused cause. This paradoxical loop of creation and non-creation presents a theological challenge. It suggests that God must have been created by something else, and this something else must have been created by something else, and so on, ad infinitum.

There are two primary answers to this question:

One based on the human understanding and attempts to explain God using logical reasoning and human interpretation.

Another based on a specific interpretation of a religious text, such as the Book of Revelation, which speculates on the nature of the Trinity and the idea of a God with an infinite chain of creators.

Both of these approaches are seen as human attempts to understand the divine, often involving mental and theological gymnastics that may not truly align with the teachings found in sacred texts. Such interpretations might be suitable for those interested in exploring the intellectual and theological dimensions of religious belief but do not necessarily reflect the divine truth contained within God's Word.

Ultimately, the infinite regression of God highlights the challenges of understanding a concept as supreme as divinity. It prompts us to seek beyond our finite understanding and embrace the mystery of the divine. As believers, it is important to recognize these interpretations as reflections of human thought rather than ultimate truths.