Stopping Supersonic Cruise Missiles: Strategies and Tactics

Introduction

Supersonic cruise missiles, such as those in the Kinzhal family, pose a significant threat due to their speed and maneuverability. This article explores the methods and strategies used to intercept and stop these sophisticated weapons. From traditional anti-missile systems to advanced technologies like directed energy weapons, each approach plays a critical role in mitigating this threat.

The Primary Methods of Defense

Anti-Missile Systems: The most effective anti-missile systems are designed to tackle supersonic cruise missiles. Anti-aircraft missiles, such as the Patriot System, demonstrate their capability to neutralize these threats. The Patriot, utilized in Ukraine, has successfully engaged and destroyed multiple hypersonic cruise missiles.

Air-to-Air Missiles: Air-to-air missiles also play a significant role in defense against supersonic cruise missiles. These missiles are optimized for intercepting fast-moving targets and can be launched from various platforms, including aircraft and ground-based systems.

Layered Defense Strategies

Gunnery Systems: As the missile approaches its target, gunnery systems, like the Phalanx Close-In Weapon System (CIWS), can intercept and destroy the missile. These systems are highly effective and complement the missile-based defenses.

Directed Energy Weapons: In the near future, directed energy weapons will become available. These advanced technologies may provide a non-lethal alternative, but they require further development and deployment.

Targeting the Bases

Understanding the Threat: Recognizing that the primary launch platforms are military airbases is crucial. Russian airbases such as Belogorsk, Novgorod, and Olenegorsk in Murmansk Oblast, Kirov, and Engels provide strategic launch points for supersonic cruise missiles like the Kinzhal.

Engines of Destruction: Russia uses three main platforms to launch the Kinzhal missile:

MIG-31: This aircraft has limited range due to the missile's mass and drag. Subsonic flight is common, and air-to-air refueling would enhance its capability. TU-22M: This bomber has a much larger range, potentially allowing it to launch from bases far from the target. Countering these aircraft presents a significant challenge. SU-34: With only around 134 built, compared to over 500 MIG-31s and TU-22Ms, the SU-34 remains a limited resource. It has also suffered significant losses, both confirmed and unconfirmed, in Ukraine.

Base Vulnerability: Airbases in Russia, such as Engles, are critical targets. While Engles has been hit before, the strategic value of these bases remains intact. Conventional attacks on these bases can significantly reduce the missile threat.

Cutting Off the Supply Line

Strategic attacks on the bases from which supersonic cruise missiles are launched can disrupt the entire missile operation. These attacks can be carried out using drones, which have demonstrated the ability to reach and potentially damage these bases. Continuous drone assaults on key airbases can neutralize the threat efficiently.

Conclusion

Stopping supersonic cruise missiles is a complex task that requires a multi-layered approach. Traditional anti-missile systems, advanced directed energy weapons, and strategic attacks on launch bases all play crucial roles. By understanding the threats and exploiting vulnerabilities, countries can effectively mitigate the risk of supersonic cruise missile attacks.