Reviewing Ken Wilber's Philosophy: Criticisms and Insights

Ken Wilber is not a conventional philosopher. Rather, his focus lies in the realm of spiritual practice and the evolution of religion and spirituality on a global scale. If you are a spiritual practitioner or interested in these matters, it is beneficial to explore Wilber's unique perspective.

Unveiling the Critiques

While Wilber's philosophy is widely respected, it is not without its criticisms. One of the key issues highlighted is his understanding of certain spiritual processes. For example, he struggles with the concept of conductivity, the Yogic transformational process, and Grace. Yet, there are insights that align with his views, which we can explore.

The Importance of Mental and Emotional Health

The first critique centers on the necessity of dealing with one's own mental and emotional health. This includes confronting the shadow side—those hidden aspects of our psyche that can significantly impact our spiritual practice. Unaddressed issues can lead to a repetitive cycle where even the best intentions fail.

Exposing the Shadow Side

A concrete example involves a deep-seated childhood fear that emerges seemingly out of nowhere, darkening the entire day. The realization that such issues must be acknowledged and dealt with is a profound one. The ancient way of dealing with the shadow side often involved yogic practices, which aimed to transform and burn away these negative energies. Such methods included profound prayer, dream yoga, or tantric practices.

Including Modern Worldviews

A significant critique is Wilber's emphasis on modern worldviews. The contemporary perspective began to take shape only a century ago, and it is essential to integrate this with ancient traditions. This involves moving beyond linear traditional thinking and embracing a more expansive, intellectually enlightened mind.

Intellectual and Emotional Evolution

Wilber calls this process "Growing Up" and it is a felt shift that involves reevaluating and integrating the insights of various spiritual traditions. This means recognizing the limitations and patterns within these traditions and moving beyond dogmatic, "one-way-only" approaches.

Criticizing Specific Aspects of Wilber's Work

Wilber has made some controversial choices in his critique of certain figures. One such figure is his teacher, Adi Da, who he discredits despite using many of his terminologies, such as "The Great Tradition," "self-contraction," and "always already." Wilber also criticizes Adi Da's 7th stage of life vision and Guru Yoga, which he simplifies alongside nondual Tantra and Kashmir Saivism.

Yogic Transformation

One of the most significant criticisms is Wilber's lack of experience and understanding of yogic transformation. This process is distinct from mental practices; rather, it is a bodily practice that aims to transform and transmute one's energy system. Despite its importance, Wilber gives it only a brief, intellectual recognition.

Conclusion

Ken Wilber's philosophy is a valuable resource for those interested in spiritual practice. However, it is important to bring attention to the areas where his work has limitations. By acknowledging these critiques, we can gain a more nuanced understanding of spiritual development and evolution.

Key Takeaways: Mental and emotional health plays a crucial role in spiritual practice. Including modern worldviews is essential in contemporary spiritual analysis. Wilber's work has both strengths and shortcomings, particularly regarding bodily practices like yoga.