Ravish Kumar's Evolving Role: From Journalist to Propagandist

Ravish Kumar, a name long associated with the Indian television news station NDTV, has seen a significant shift in his role and stance in recent years. Once a respected journalist, he has transformed into a figure accused of supporting anti-India parties and becoming a tool for propaganda. Let's delve into how he has changed and the consequences of his actions.

Ravish Kumar: A Legacy of Support and Criticism

Previously, Ravish Kumar was known for his Prime Time Show, a critical program that often delved into controversial and underreported issues. The show's success lay in its ability to provide a voice to marginalized communities and air issues that larger news agencies might overlook. People held a special place for programs like Ravish Ki Report, which is often remembered as one of the best shows ever produced in the journalism industry.

From Supporting Farm Laws to Becoming a Critic of the Government

Before 2014, Ravish Kumar was a vocal and influential supporter of the Farm Laws, advocating for their implementation and criticising the Congress government for opposing them. He was also a strong proponent of the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA). His advocacy during that time reflected his alignment with certain political stances. Notably, even Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, a Congress leader, was concerned about the minority condition in Bangladesh, but the CAA was never implemented under the Congress regime.

Journalling for the Common Man: Advocating for the Poor

One of the markers of Ravish Kumar's early journalism was his advocacy for common people and the poor. His work often centered around elevating their voices and fighting for their rights. This not only made him a role model for aspiring journalists in states like Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, Jharkhand, and Madhya Pradesh but also endeared him to a wide audience who trusted his unbiased reporting.

Becoming a Propagandist: The Transformation

After 2014, Ravish Kumar's role began to shift. Instead of being a critic of the government, he started aligning with political entities that shared his views. His criticism of the government became more frequent and personal. Notably, he started associating almost every negative development in the country with Narendra Modi, the Prime Minister. This transition from an independent journalist to a propagandist became evident when he began criticizing the Ghats of Varanasi, a site of historical and cultural significance. Such actions raise serious questions about his objectivity and journalistic integrity.

Conclusion: The Impact of Propaganda on Journalism

The transformation of Ravish Kumar from a respected journalist to a propagandist serves as a cautionary tale about the dangers of losing one's journalistic integrity. While it is natural for journalists to support certain causes or policies, crossing the line into outright propaganda can erode public trust and lead to serious repercussions. It is crucial for media professionals to maintain their independence and objectivity, ensuring that their work continues to serve the public interest.

As we reflect on Ravish Kumar's journey, it is important to recognize the impact of his actions on the journalism industry. The line between advocacy and propaganda can be blurry, but it is essential to stay truthful and unbiased in the pursuit of truth.