Is the GTX 1650 4GB Suitable for Animation?

When considering whether the GTX 1650 4GB is suitable for animation, it’s important to look at both the performance of the GPU and the requirements of animation software and workflows. This card, released in 2018, has seen significant changes in the graphics card market over the years, but where does it stand for animation tasks?

Comparing Performance

Let's start by comparing the GTX 1650 4GB with its predecessor, the RX 570, which was released in 2016. During that time, GPUs in the ~145-150 range were more affordable and the RX 570 was considered a superior performer compared to the GTX 1650. However, technological advancements have brought about improvements in both efficiency and performance in newer GPUs.

The GTX 1650 is indeed more power-efficient, which is a significant advantage for users looking to extend battery life or reduce power consumption. Yet, when comparing to the RX 570, the latter was a faster performer. With advancements, the GTX 1650 Super, released in 2019, showed better performance compared to the GTX 1060 3/6 GB versions and even matched the RX 580. Additionally, the GTX 1650 Super demonstrated significantly better power efficiency, making it an attractive option for those who care about energy use.

Why Gaming GPUs May Not Be Ideal for Animation

While the GTX 1650 Super can offer good performance, it is not typically recommended for animators who require powerful GPUs for tasks such as rendering, modeling, and animation. Animators often need GPUs with the latest technology, high VRAM, and specific features that gaming GPUs don't always have. Industry-standard GPUs for animation, such as the RTX 3090, Titan RTX, or RX 690T, are typically recommended because they provide the necessary performance and features.

These high-end cards offer more VRAM, better memory bandwidth, and advanced features like ray tracing and AI acceleration—functions that are crucial for animation. For instance, the RTX 3090 provides 24GB of VRAM and exceptional memory bandwidth, far surpassing the GTX 1650 4GB. Similarly, the Titan RTX and RX 690T offer better compute and rendering capabilities that are optimized for professional tasks like animation.

Conclusion

Returning to the initial question, if you’re seeking a card that can do the job of basic animation tasks, a GTX 1650 4GB might suffice. However, if you’re an animator and looking for a GPU that provides a smooth and efficient workflow, you might want to consider higher-end options like an RTX 3090, Titan RTX, or RX 690T. These cards are designed to handle the intensive computational demands of animation software, delivering the performance, VRAM, and advanced features necessary for professional use.

Ultimately, the choice depends on your specific needs and budget. For those on a budget, the GTX 1650 Super can be a solid option for basic tasks, but for serious animators, investing in a more powerful professional-grade GPU is a smarter long-term choice.