The Dilemma of Not Voting for Trump or Biden

Many people wonder if not voting for Donald Trump or Joe Biden is a wasted vote. This question often centers around the support for one of these candidates or the belief in the flawed two-party system. However, examining the underlying reasons can provide clearer insights.

The Impact of the Electoral College

The U.S. Constitution's Electoral College system plays a crucial role in deciding the president. If three candidates secured electoral votes, the Constitution's method for choosing a president would become even less democratic. This could lead to the potential collapse of the Constitution itself, which is central to the American capitalist system.

Therefore, unless one desires a shift to a communist system, voting for one of the major party candidates is essential. This choice not only aligns with the current political structure but also helps in maintaining the democratic processes of the United States. The Electoral College serves as a vital safeguard against too much direct popular influence in the election process.

The Flawed Two-Party System

Some argue that supporting the "flawed" two-party system is unjustified. However, statistics, common knowledge, and experience suggest that in contemporary elections, the majority of voters typically support the main candidate of either party. Hence, any vote for a third-party candidate is statistically unlikely to affect the outcome.

Given the presence of candidates like Trump, Pence, Desantis, and Christy, maximizing votes for the two main candidates (Biden or Trump) is crucial to avoid a repeat of the recent election. Supporting either Biden or Trump, even if not one's first choice, is more likely to yield a successful result.

The Importance of Strategic Voting

Voting for a third-party candidate under the two-party system has limited impact on the election's outcome. Instead, strategic voting can be more effective. A vote against a candidate one dislikes can increase the chances of electing a preferred candidate.

During the campaign, voters should research the issues and understand the positions of the candidates. Sometimes, neither candidate fully meets one's preferences, but one option may be significantly worse than the other. By voting against the less preferred candidate, one can increase the likelihood of electing the more tolerable option.

Ultimately, the Biden victory, despite numerous challenges and criticism, can be attributed to strategic voting and the efforts of voters to prevent an even more undesirable outcome.

Conclusion

The decision on whether to vote for Trump or Biden comes down to pragmatic considerations. While the two-party system may have flaws, it is the most likely system to ensure a democratic and stable outcome. Strategic voting can be a more effective approach to ensuring the election results reflect the will of the majority.

Key Takeaways

The Electoral College system is essential for maintaining the Constitution and the capitalist system. Majority voting patterns suggest that votes for third-party candidates are statistically unlikely to change the outcome. Strategic voting can be more effective in ensuring a preferred outcome, especially when the alternatives are equally undesirable.

Keywords: electoral votes, major party candidates, two-party system