How Does Intel Core i7-10750H Stack Up Against the i7-9750H?

When it comes to the Intel Core i7-10750H and i7-9750H processors, there's been quite a bit of discussion and speculation about how they stack up against each other. While it's still a rumor, many industry insiders and tech enthusiasts suggest that the i7-10750H offers only slight improvements over the i7-9750H. In this article, we will explore the bench marks and specifications of both processors to provide a comprehensive comparison, aimed at helping consumers make an informed decision.

Intel Core i7-10750H Processor - Benchmarks and Specs

The i7-10750H is a 14nm processor based on the Coffee Lake-R architecture. It features six cores and twelve threads operating at a base clock speed of 2.6 GHz, and a boost clock of up to 4.7 GHz. The processor supports up to 128GB ECC DDR4 memory, has up to 24MB of last-level cache, and is built on Intel Optane Memory technology. This is designed for faster boot-up times and quicker loading of applications, enhancing overall system performance. The TDP (thermal design power) is set at 45W, allowing it to maintain a good balance between performance and battery life.

Intel Core i7-9750H Processor - Benchmarks and Specs

The i7-9750H is an 8th generation processor that falls under the Coffee Lake-R family. It also has six cores and twelve threads, operating at a base clock speed of 2.6 GHz, and a boost clock of up to 4.5 GHz. The i7-9750H supports up to 64GB of DDR4 memory, has 12MB of last-level cache, and integrates Intel UHD Graphics 630, which offers decent performance for general gaming and video playback. The TDP for the i7-9750H is also set at 45W, making it comparable in power consumption to the i7-10750H.

Performance Comparison

Both processors claim to have six cores and twelve threads, but the i7-10750H includes a significant boost in the cache size, going from 12MB in the i7-9750H to 24MB in the i7-10750H. This increase in cache can lead to better cache hit rates, significantly improving performance, especially in multi-threaded workloads. Intel also improved the power management of the i7-10750H, allowing for more efficient use of the processor under load.

When benchmarked, the i7-10750H generally outperforms the i7-9750H by around 10-15% in multi-threaded benchmarks. This includes workloads such as 3D rendering, video encoding, and complex simulations. In single-threaded benchmarks, such as gaming and light office work, the performance difference is less pronounced, often being within 5-10%.

Conclusion

While the i7-10750H offers only modest improvements over the i7-9750H, it does provide better performance in more complex, multi-threaded tasks. The improvements in cache size and power management make the i7-10750H a more suitable option for demanding workloads and applications that rely on multi-threaded performance. However, the i7-9750H remains a reliable choice for users who require good performance for general use without the need for heavy, multi-threaded workloads.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Q: What is the difference between the Intel Core i7-10750H and i7-9750H?

The main differences include a larger cache size in the i7-10750H, improved power management features, and slightly better multi-threaded performance. The i7-9750H offers a more balanced performance for general use.

Q: Which processor is better for gaming?

For gaming, both processors will offer good performance, but the i7-9750H's improved power consumption and more balanced performance make it a better choice for general use that includes light gaming. The i7-10750H is more suited for demanding applications, such as professional software or complex games with many thread-intensive operations.

Q: Should I upgrade from the i7-9750H to the i7-10750H?

If you primarily use your computer for general tasks, including some gaming, the i7-9750H will likely be sufficient. However, if your workload involves a lot of multi-threaded tasks or you need better performance for video editing and 3D rendering, upgrading to the i7-10750H might be worth considering.