Fingerspelling vs. Signed Language: Which is Preferable for Deaf Individuals?

The preference for fingerspelling versus signed language among deaf individuals can vary widely based on personal experiences, cultural background, and the context in which communication takes place.

Personal Preferences and Fingerspelling

While some deaf individuals may find fingerspelling useful, many prefer signed language over it. Take, for example, a deaf individual who communicates through fingerspelling or written text. They might prefer reading something on a paper over being spelled out to them. The reason for this preference lies in the efficiency and expressiveness of signed language.

Writing or fingerspelling can be tedious, especially in a conversational context. Imagine a person spelling out their thoughts to you for several minutes; it can be frustrating and even lead to physical discomfort. A person with fingerspelling skills might not keep their hands still, leading to spelling errors, and the overall process can be excessively slow. This makes signed language a much better alternative for clear and efficient communication.

Expressiveness of Signed Language

Sign language is incredibly expressive. It allows for a wide range of emotions and concepts to be conveyed through the use of the entire body, not just the hands. A good signer can communicate a wealth of information using the limited palette of hand movements and facial expressions. This makes it a more engaging and comprehensive form of communication.

The palm signing technique, which is particularly useful in low-light conditions, is another aspect that highlighted the richness of signed language. The use of the palm to communicate can be astounding, especially with proficient communicators. A parent-daughter duo, Hilke, a proficient palm signer, demonstrates that this method can convey both the intended message and emotions effectively. Through palm signing, deaf individuals can understand not just the words but also the feelings behind them.

Falls Back on Writing for Deaf People

While signed language is highly preferable, it is important to note that not all deaf individuals use it or are part of the deaf community. Writing or texting can be a fallback method, especially when signed language is not an option. However, some deaf people may have challenges with reading or writing, particularly if their education was not effective or if they did not have reliable access to their language during their critical language-acquisition years. This highlights the importance of providing appropriate communication methods based on the individual's needs and background.

The Complexity of Communication

It is crucial to consider several aspects when determining the best communication method for deaf individuals. Firstly, not all deaf people use sign language or are part of the deaf community. Some may prefer reading or writing due to a love of the written word, or because they want to read the original text, such as in English, for music, poetry, or well-crafted prose.

Furthermore, English and sign language are distinct grammatically. If a person has grown up culturally deaf and uses sign language as their first language, presenting text in written English would be akin to presenting a second language. This can lead to misunderstandings and a less engaging or inclusive experience. Additionally, poorly written or drastically summarized English text can result in a sub-par message, potentially missing subtle or important nuances such as irony, sarcasm, or humor. These elements are often clearer and equally present in signed language, contributing to better working and personal relationships.

In conclusion, for deaf individuals, the preference for communication through signed language is generally more effective and engaging. While fingerspelling or writing can be useful fallbacks, understanding the unique needs and preferences of individuals is key to ensuring effective and inclusive communication.