Decentralization: A Path to True Progress or an Illusion of Freedom?

The concept of decentralization is often invoked with the promise of enhancing progress and freedom. However, its true implications and effectiveness vary widely. De facto and de jure separation of powers, particularly in legal and political systems, is seen as a cornerstone for progress. Conversely, the consolidation of power in various domains such as the military-industrial complex and labor unions can prove detrimental. This article explores the nuanced relationship between decentralization and progress, with a particular focus on the separation of powers, the challenges of progress, and the role of freedom.

Centrally Placed Power vs. Separation of Powers

Decentralization, in theory, can lead to a better distribution of power, reducing the risks associated with concentration of authority. However, the implementation and effectiveness of decentralization are far from straightforward. A critical aspect of decentralization is the separation of powers, both de facto and de jure. The legal system, for instance, should be completely separate from the political system. This can be achieved through mechanisms such as legal professionals electing themselves or being directly elected to positions. However, in practice, many institutions, such as the military-industrial complex, remain de facto unseparated. These interconnected entities maintain their power through robust business, political, and military ties, which can stifle true decentralization.

The Role of Unions in Decentralization

Similarly, the role of unions in decentralization is complex. Unions, which are instrumental in protecting workers' rights and ensuring fair wages, can also become centralized entities that are closely aligned with political parties. The globalization of the economy has made national unions obsolete as they struggle to operate in a globalized market. The solution, however, lies in a world labor organization that can counterbalance the world trade organization. This would ensure that labor rights are protected and upheld on a global scale, promoting a more decentralized and equitable economic system.

The Question of Progress

Who gets to decide what "progress" is? This question is often answered by the proponents of a one-world government, where everyone is supposedly treated equally and lives in a controlled utopia. This vision, while appealing to some, can be seen as the ultimate defeat of freedom and individuality. For historical figures and many Americans, progress has been about freedom, not control. The American Revolution, where people were willing to pay taxes to the king rather than live in a controlled and contrived world, exemplifies this point. Progress, in this context, is about enabling people to live naturally, in harmony with God's intentions, rather than in a forced utopia.

Abandoning Control for True Freedom

Progress, for many, is not about technology, pollution, or efficiency. It is about living a natural life that aligns with human nature. This requires rejecting the idea of a controlled utopia and embracing the reality of human imperfection. We can strive to make people happier, but we must accept that risk and imperfection are inevitable aspects of human existence. If we choose to reject these realities in favor of an idealized world, we risk losing our freedom. The essence of progress, then, lies in enabling individuals to live freely and authentically, rather than conforming to an ideal that may never be fully attainable.

Conclusion: The Nuances of Decentralization and Progress

Decentralization is a complex and nuanced subject. While it can lead to a more equitable distribution of power and greater freedom, its implementation must be carefully managed to avoid the rise of centralized power structures. The separation of powers, the role of unions, and the definition of progress are all critical elements that must be carefully considered. Ultimately, true progress lies in enabling individuals to live freely, rather than imposing an idealized vision of society. The challenge lies in balancing central authority and local autonomy, ensuring that progress is about empowering individuals, not controlling them.