Debating the Feasibility and Implications of Assassinating Putin

Introduction: A Controversial Proposal

The idea of assassinating Russian President Vladimir Putin has been discussed, sparking intense debate on the potential consequences and ethical implications. This article explores why the United States should avoid such a risky and disastrous path.

Why the United States Should Abstain from Assassination

No option for assassination through drone strikes or any covert operations should be pursued by the US. Simply the mere suggestion of American involvement could have severe and unintended consequences for all parties involved.

Consequences of US Involvement

The global reaction to a US-backed assassination attempt would be tumultuous. Potential retaliation from Russia in the form of nuclear attacks is a real possibility, as evidenced by the HIGMs (High- Glide Intercontinental Trajectory Missiles).

Turn Putin into a Martyr

Instead of assassinating Putin, his incarceration may provide a more humane and less extreme solution. By keeping him detained, he can gain insight into the extent of his own cruelty and her cruel policies.

Responsibility and Consequences

Assassination of Putin would result in enormous international repercussions. Regardless of the actual instigator, Russia would hold someone accountable, likely leading to a massive escalation of conflict.

Nuclear Deterrence

A drone strike on Putin or any Russian leader would likely trigger a similar response from Russia. This mutual assured destruction would result in the use of nuclear weapons, which poses an existential threat to the world.

Addressing the Root of the Issue

For both the US and Russia, the primary goal should be to remove unstable and dangerous leaders who pose a significant risk to global peace and stability. This can be achieved through legal and more diplomatic means.

The Future of Russian Leadership

Instead of assassinating Putin, Russians should focus on removing their current president, who is considered "bat-shit crazy." Such a change in leadership could prevent the initiation of devastating wars and international conflicts.

Conclusion: Ethical and Pragmatic Approaches

Assassination is not a viable or ethical solution to resolve conflicts. Instead, constructive dialogue and legal mechanisms should be prioritized to address the issue of unstable leadership and prevent the escalation of tensions.

Final Thoughts

While the idea of Putin's assassination might seem appealing to some, it is crucial to consider the larger geopolitical implications and the potential for even greater tragedy. Diplomacy, international cooperation, and legal processes offer more prudent avenues to resolve disputes and maintain global stability.