Cyber Force vs. Space Force: A Comparative Analysis in the Digital Age

In the current global political climate, the focus on creating a Cyber Force has surpassed that of a Space Force. This decision is not merely about image and prestige, but also about the practical and economical advantages of focusing on cyber capabilities. While a Space Force has existed since 1957 and a Cyber Force has been in operation since the 1960s, this article delves into the historical context, operational roles, and future implications of each force. Cyber Force offers a more practical solution given today's technological landscape.

Introduction to Space and Cyber Forces

Both the Space Force and the Cyber Force have rich histories and indispensable roles in modern warfare. The Space Force, officially established in 2019, has evolved from various organizations and missions throughout its history. Starting as early as the 1950s with the Navy, Air Force, DARPA, SDIO (Strategic Defense Initiatives Office), NRO (National Reconnaissance Office), and Army, the Space Force has undertaken a broad range of missions, from developing launch vehicles to providing critical defense against incoming ICBMs.

Historical Evolution of Space Force

The Space Force has been known by several names and has been distributed across various organizations. For instance, the Navy, Air Force, and DARPA have played significant roles in developing launch vehicles, ground-based control infrastructure, and providing personnel for military missions in space. Additionally, the NRO has operated the reconnaissance satellites, while the MDA (Missile Defense Agency) has focused on defending against ICBM attacks. Over time, these roles have evolved and changed to meet the needs of modern warfare.

Contemporary Operations of the Space Force

Today, the US Air Force Space Command operates the largest component of the Space Force, with significant support from NRO for reconnaissance and MDA in defending against ICBM threats. To gain a deeper understanding of the Space Force's current operations, one can refer to the following videos:

Bill Ottos Answer to Why do we need a Space Force and what would happen to NASA?

These missions are crucial in maintaining national security and protecting military assets from both terrestrial and space-based threats.

Cyber Force and Its Operational Roles

Contrary to the Space Force, the Cyber Force has a long-standing presence. The National Security Agency (NSA) has been in operation since 1952 and has been involved in many of the foundational aspects of what is now known as "cyber warfare" since the 1960s. Other agencies, including the CIA and FBI, have also taken up significant roles in cyber defense and offense. Most law enforcement agencies around the world are now heavily involved in cyber security and warfare, highlighting the growing importance of this domain.

Economic and Practical Considerations

Creating a Cyber Force is often seen as a more economical and practical choice. It aligns with the current geopolitical landscape, where cyber threats are pervasive and constant. As mentioned earlier, the cyber domain has evolved to encompass photo reconnaissance, electronic surveillance, navigation and weather satellites, and global secure military communication. The development of ICBMs and orbiting platforms to deliver nuclear warheads has also been crucial. However, defending against incoming ICBMs or warheads involves a complex and specialized set of technologies that remain the purview of the Space Force.

Advantages of a Cyber Force Over a Space Force

The Cyber Force has certain advantages over the Space Force, primarily in terms of cost and practical application. While the Space Force has a broader scope and includes many high-profile and technologically advanced missions, the cyber domain is rapidly evolving, and threats are becoming more sophisticated. The cyber force is better positioned to handle and adapt to these fast-changing threats.

Critical Analysis and Future Prospects

It is highly unlikely that bringing these organizations under one roof would significantly enhance their effectiveness. In fact, integrating them could lead to redundancies and inefficiencies. For example, in 2001, I attended a conference in Oxnard, CA, where the NRO, NASA, and the Air Force agreed to share classified technology, which had been developed independently by various agencies. This collaboration demonstrated that sharing resources and expertise can be more productive than integration. Similar efforts should continue to enhance collaboration and efficiency in both domains.

Conclusion

The decision to prioritize the creation of a Cyber Force over a Space Force is primarily driven by the current techno-political climate. Given the practical and economic advantages, a focused Cyber Force is more aligned with the needs of modern warfare. However, this does not diminish the critical role of the Space Force in protecting national security and maintaining a robust defense posture. A balanced approach that leverages the strengths of both forces is essential for ensuring a secure and resilient future.